Graphene and Bioplastics: Innovation for Enhanced Sustainability

Graphene and Bioplastics:

Innovation for Enhanced Sustainability

Awareness of environmental protection and the commitment to meeting the United Nations’ 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have fueled the growth of the bioplastic industry. This sector is striving to take the lead in the race against synthetic products, many of which, while non-toxic and recyclable, lack biodegradability.

                                “Currently, only 1% of all plastic produced is bioplastic.”

What Are Bioplastics?

Bioplastics are materials derived from natural and chemical sources, obtained from renewable resources or petroleum-based derivatives. As a result, they offer major advantages, including full biodegradability, high recyclability, and a minimal carbon footprint. Additionally, bioplastics exhibit excellent optical, mechanical, antioxidant, and antimicrobial properties. However, like most materials, bioplastics also have limitations, the two most notable being low tensile strength and moisture resistance.

Despite these challenges, and given the goal of minimizing carbon footprints and reducing the use of synthetic or single-use polymers, the bioplastic industry has been evolving to overcome its limitations. This has been achieved through the incorporation of reinforcing agents such as fillers, compatibilizers, plasticizers, and even nanotechnology through the use of nanoparticles.

The most well-known bioplastics include polylactic acid (PLA), polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB), cellulose derivatives, starch, and chitosan. Among them, PLA has gained significant traction as a biodegradable thermoplastic polymer approved by the FDA. In recent years, it has emerged as a viable alternative to replace non-biodegradable fossil-based polymers traditionally used in the food, medical, agricultural, textile, and automotive industries. PLA exhibits characteristics like some petroleum-derived plastics. As a result, numerous PLA-based products are already available in the market, including blow-molded bottles, injection-molded cups, spoons, and forks, thermoformed trays and cups, paper coatings, textile fibers, and even medical supplies.

“Over 160 tons of PLA packaging are produced annually, accounting for approximately 13% of all bioplastics, making it the second most used in the sector after starch.”

PLA is produced from lactic acid through the fermentation of renewable resources such as rice, wheat, corn, sugarcane, potatoes, and beets. Due to its nature, PLA shares similar mechanical and barrier limitations with other biomaterials. As a result, various strategies have been developed to enhance its properties. For example, to improve its crystallinity and biodegradability, PLA is combined with polymers such as polyethylene glycol, ethylene vinyl alcohol, or poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate). To maintain its compostability, it is blended with other starch-based biopolymers such as corn, cassava, and beet starch. Finally, to improve impermeability, tensile strength, and thermal stability, graphene has emerged as a highly promising material.

“Other nanoparticles used in the bioplastic industry include silver, magnesium oxide, zinc oxide, titanium dioxide, hydroxyapatite, silica, alumina, magnetite, zirconium oxide, calcium carbonate, and recently, graphene.”

¿ What Is Graphene?

Graphene is a nanoscale structure generally extracted from graphite, a mineral composed solely of carbon. Unlike graphite, however, graphene consists of one or a few layers of tightly interconnected carbon atoms. It can be combined with numerous compounds to enhance its mechanical, thermal, electrical, barrier, and antimicrobial properties.

The benefits of graphene in biopolymers such as PLA are extensive. For example, studies have incorporated small amounts of graphene into compostable PLA films with thermoplastic cassava starch for food and agricultural applications. Remarkably, using just 0.1% graphene has resulted in:

  • ~75% improvement in elongation resistance
  • ~500% increase in film toughness
  • 100% enhancement in elasticity modulus
  • 35-50% reduction in oxygen permeability

Regarding mechanical improvements, studies conclude that in graphene-reinforced polymers subjected to tensile stress, surface fractures propagate freely unless they encounter a graphene sheet. Since graphene is a rigid material, the fracture is forced to find an alternate path, increasing deformation energy and ultimately resulting in high elongation-to-break values.

“Low concentrations of graphene are sufficient to create a crack-bridging mechanism during tensile stress. However, high concentrations can lead to nanoparticle agglomeration, causing the opposite effect.”

Increased impermeability to oxygen and moisture is another key advantage, attributed to the tortuous path created by graphene layers within the polymer. This structure hinders the penetration and movement of molecules. This phenomenon is closely linked to good graphene-polymer compatibility and dispersion, which prevents material aggregation. To improve compatibility, graphene can be chemically modified with oxygen-containing groups, leading to its most well-known variant: graphene oxide (GO). The presence of oxygen and hydrogen molecules in GO allows for further functionalization with other nanoparticles (e.g., cellulose or zinc oxide nanocrystals) or compounds (e.g., amine or amide groups), modifying its behavior based on the desired objective.

For example, a 2023 study published in Polymer Testing evaluated PLA barrier properties using GO functionalized with two types of alkylamines (decylamine (DA) and octadecylamine (ODA)) to enhance its food packaging performance. The results reported a 30% reduction in oxygen permeability with just 0.7% functionalized GO and a 50% reduction in water vapor permeability using 0.2% GO, significantly extending shelf life. If PLA can further improve its properties, it has the potential to replace polystyrene and PET—two of the most widely used materials in the packaging industry.

Graphene’s Antimicrobial Potential

Another crucial advantage of graphene—not only in PLA but in other materials—is its well-documented antimicrobial properties, which do not necessarily involve a biocidal effect. One of graphene’s mechanisms is preventing microorganism adhesion to surfaces through various pathways, regardless of their nature.

Specific research on PLA with graphene also supports this claim. Studies indicate that incorporating 1% GO in PLA films reduces film porosity, decreases oxygen permeability, and demonstrates significant antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. These properties further enhance its potential for food packaging and preservation.

Conclusion

This article used PLA as a model to illustrate the benefits graphene can offer to the bioplastic industry. However, other biomaterials such as chitosan, cellulose, and starch can also be significantly improved with graphene.

In general, research shows that graphene has the potential to enhance multiple properties of materials. However, achieving this requires:

  1. Selecting the right type of graphene
  2. Determining its optimal concentration
  3. Assessing the need for chemical modifications to optimize performance for different applications

Ultimately, striking a favorable balance between mechanical, barrier, and optical properties is essential. By leveraging graphene’s unique characteristics, the bioplastic industry can move closer to sustainable, high-performance materials with reduced environmental impact.

Written by: EF/DHS

References:

  1. Remilson Cruz, et al., Development of biodegradable nanocomposites based on PLA and functionalized graphene oxide. Polymer Testing 124 (2023) 108066
  2. Mulla, et al., Poly Lactic Acid (PLA) Nanocomposites: Effect of Inorganic Nanoparticles Reinforcement on Its Performance and Food Packaging Applications. Molecules 2021, 26, 1967
  3. Saranya Ramesh Kumar et. al., Bio-based and biodegradable polymers – State-of-the art, challenges and emerging trends. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry 2020, 21:75
  4. De Carvalho, A.P.A.; Conte Junior, C.A. Green strategies for active food packagings: A systematic review on active properties of graphene-b Trends Food Sci Technol, 103, 2020, 130
  5. Anibal Bher et. al., Toughening of Poly(lactic acid) and Thermoplastic Cassava Starch Reactive Blends Using Graphene Nanoplatelets. Polymers 2018, 10, 95
  6. Yasir Ali Arfat et. al., Polylactide/graphene oxide nanosheets/clove essential oil composite films for potential food packaging applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol, 107, 2018, 194
  7. Valapa, R.B.; et. al., Effect of graphene content on the properties of poly(lactic acid) nanocomposites. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 28410
  8. Ahmadi-Moghadam, et. al., Effect of functionalization of graphene nanoplatelets on the mechanical response of graphene/epoxy composites. Mater. Des. 2015, 66, 142
  9. Seshadri, M.; Saigal, S. Crack bridging in polymer nanocomposites. J. Eng. Mech. 2007, 133, 911

Biocompatibility and Biodegradability of Graphene: Advances and Scientific Evidence

Biocompatibility and Biodegradability of Graphene:

Advances and Scientific Evidence

Graphene is widely recognized for its exceptional properties and its potential to revolutionize various industries. However, as a relatively recent technology with emerging applications, concerns have arisen regarding its impact on human health and the environment. Therefore, it is essential to analyze scientific studies that have evaluated its biocompatibility and biodegradability, providing evidence of its safety and behavior in different biological systems.

Biocompatibility: Defined as the absence of allergic or immune adverse reactions to a material in the body

Over the past decade, multiple studies have demonstrated that graphene and its derivatives can be biocompatible under certain conditions. Research on its interaction with blood, cell differentiation, kidney function, neuronal activation, and bone regeneration has yielded positive results. The following key findings stand out:

2012 – Compatibility with blood and macrophage response. The nanotoxicity of graphene on macrophages was evaluated based on its effects on metabolic activity, membrane integrity, oxidative stress induction, hemolysis, platelet activation and aggregation, coagulation cascade, cytokine induction, and immune cell activation and suppression.

Results indicated that while graphene does interact with macrophages, toxicity is significantly reduced through surface functionalization. Regarding blood compatibility, both functionalized and non-functionalized graphene exhibited excellent compatibility with red blood cells, platelets, and plasma coagulation pathways, with minimal alteration in cytokine expression by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Additionally, no premature immune cell activation or suppression was observed up to a relatively high concentration of graphene (75 μg mL⁻¹) after 72 hours of in vitro incubation.

Conclusion: Possible graphene toxicity can be easily avoided through surface functionalization.

A. Sasidharan, et. al., Hemocompatibility and Macrophage Response of Pristine and Functionalized Graphene, Small, 2012, 8, 1251

2014- Cardiac cell differentiation. The effect of graphene on the cardiomyogenic differentiation of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) was analyzed. Graphene was synthesized via CVD and deposited on vitronectin-coated glass, a multifunctional protein found in plasma, platelets, and the extracellular matrix, to ensure hESC viability. Cells were cultured for 21 days, and results showed that graphene promoted the expression of genes involved in gradual differentiation into mesodermal and endodermal lineage cells and subsequently into cardiomyocytes, compared to cultures on glass without graphene.

Conclusion: Graphene can provide a platform for developing stem cell therapies for heart diseases by enhancing the cardiomyogenic differentiation of human embryonic stem cells.

Tae-Jin Lee, et. al., Graphene enhances the cardiomyogenic differentiation of human embryonic stem cells, Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2014, 452(1):174

2016- Impact on kidney function. The effect of intravenously administered graphene oxide (GO) on the kidneys of mice was studied. Results showed that GO was excreted through urine, indicating rapid transit through the glomerular filtration barrier (GFB) without nephrotoxicity. The analysis concluded an absence of kidney function impairment up to one month after GO injection at increasing doses. Histological examination found no damage to the glomerular and tubular regions of the kidneys. Ultrastructural analysis also revealed no damage or changes in podocyte slit size, endothelial cell fenestra, or glomerular basement membrane width. Endothelial and podocyte cultures restored their barrier function after >48 hours of GO exposure, with significant cellular uptake observed in both cell types after 24 hours.

Conclusion: GO is not toxic to the kidneys..

Dhifaf A. Jasim, et. al., The Effects of Extensive Glomerular Filtration of Thin Graphene Oxide Sheets on Kidney Physiology. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 12, 10753

2018- Effect on Neuronal Activation. The effect of monolayer graphene on neuronal activation was evaluated. It was identified that graphene modifies membrane-associated functions in cultured cells, meaning it adjusts the distribution of extracellular ions at the interface with neurons—a key regulator of neuronal excitability.

The observed membrane changes included stronger potassium ion currents and a shift in the fraction of neuronal activation phenotypes from adaptive to tonic activation. The study’s hypothesis suggested that graphene-ion interactions are maximized when single-layer graphene is deposited on electrically insulating substrates.

Conclusion: Graphene oxide can act as a substrate for neuronal interaction.

N. P. Pampaloni, et. al., Single-layer graphene modulates neuronal communication and augments membrane ion currents, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2018, 13, 755

2018- Adjuvant in the Proliferation of Pulmonary and Neuronal Cells. Graphene oxide “papers” of different sizes and thicknesses were fabricated as a substrate for the culture of human pulmonary and neuronal cells. Their capacity for cell adhesion and proliferation was evaluated, along with a possible cytotoxic response by detecting lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in cell supernatants.

Conclusion: Graphene oxide can act as a biocompatible cellular substrate for cell growth without cytotoxic effects, opening greater possibilities for tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, and bionic applications.D. A. Jasim, et. al., Graphene-based papers as substrates for cell growth: Characterisation and impact on mammalian cells, FlatChem, 2018, 12, 17

2020- Biocompatibility of Graphene in Dental Materials. The biocompatibility of a graphene-containing restorative material and dental cement was studied on a mandibular defect in an animal model. Cytotoxicity was evaluated in vitro at 24 hours on human dental follicle stem cells and oral keratinocytes. In vivo studies were conducted seven weeks after implantation, including histological analysis of collected bone tissue, plasma biochemistry, oxidative stress assessment, and subchronic organ toxicity analysis.

The in vitro results showed that the materials did not induce toxicity in cells. In vivo, the animal models exhibited no symptoms of acute toxicity or local inflammation. No changes were detected in organ weights, and histological analysis revealed no alterations in liver or kidney tissues. Systemic toxicity of the materials in organs was not observed.

Conclusion: The study provides further evidence of the potential of graphene-based dental materials for bone regeneration and biocompatibility.

A. Dreanca, et. al., Systemic and Local Biocompatibility Assessment of Graphene Composite Dental Materials in Experimental Mandibular Bone Defect. Materials 2020, 13, 2511; doi:10.3390/ma13112511

2022- Risks of Graphene in Microplastics. The study was conducted on a composite of polyamide 6 or Nylon-6, a plastic commonly used in the automotive and sports industries, reinforced with reduced graphene oxide (rGO 2.5%). The material was then subjected to wear to emulate natural processes throughout its useful life, releasing particles approximately between 1.9 µm and 3.2 µm in size. To analyze the effects of the worn particles along the most likely exposure routes, in vitro human cell models of the lungs, gastrointestinal tract, skin, and immune system were used, as well as an animal model to study pulmonary exposure in vivo.

At the end of the study, only limited acute responses were found after exposure to the microplastics in the different models. Only the free rGO induced significant adverse effects, particularly in macrophages.

Conclusion: Microplastics with graphene suggest a low risk to human health. Graphene materials should not be inhaled.

S. Chortarea, et. al., Hazard assessment of abraded thermoplastic composites reinforced with reduced graphene oxide, Journal of Hazardous Materials 435 (2022) 129053.

2023- Pulmonary Function. The biological response, distribution, and biopersistence of four types of graphene in the lungs of mice were analyzed up to 28 days after a single oropharyngeal aspiration. The results showed that none of the materials induced a strong pulmonary immune response, with neutrophils being more effective at internalizing, degrading, and eliminating small graphene sheets (~50nm) than macrophages, as larger sheets (~8µm) may have greater persistence.

Conclusion: Graphene does not cause an inflammatory response in the lungs; however, it is important to consider the size of the sheets, as smaller ones are easier to eliminate from the airways and, therefore, safer.

Thomas Loret, et. al., Lung Persistence, Biodegradation, and Elimination of Graphene-Based Materials are Predominantly Size-Dependent and Mediated by Alveolar Phagocytes, Small, 2023,19(39): e2301201

2024- Pulmonary and Cardiovascular Function. An in vivo study was conducted to evaluate the effect of graphene oxide inhalation on pulmonary and cardiovascular function in healthy humans. For the trial, 14 volunteers inhaled small and ultrafine graphene oxide sheets at a controlled concentration during two-hour repeated visits. Heart rate, blood pressure, pulmonary function, and inflammatory markers were unaffected regardless of particle size; blood analysis showed few differential plasma proteins, and thrombus formation increased slightly in an ex vivo arterial injury model.

Conclusion: Graphene oxide inhalation can be tolerated and is not associated with apparent harmful effects in healthy humans. The study lays the groundwork for further human studies that examine a larger number of individuals as well as different types and doses of graphene.

Jack P. M. Andrews, First-in-human controlled inhalation of thin graphene oxide nanosheets to study acute cardiorespiratory responses. Nature nanotechonoly, 2024, 19, 705.

Biodegradation: Process by which a substance is broken down by living organisms through enzymatic or metabolic mechanisms

One of the most relevant aspects in evaluating the safety of graphene is its biodegradability. Research conducted under the Graphene Flagship project has demonstrated that graphene and graphene oxide can be successfully degraded, as follows:

2018 – Researchers affiliated with the European Union’s Graphene Flagship project, from institutions such as the National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS) in France, the University of Strasbourg, the Karolinska Institute, and the University of Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM), through studies such as “Dispersibility-Dependent Biodegradation of Graphene Oxide by Myeloperoxidase” (2015), “Graphene Oxide is Degraded by Neutrophils and the Degradation Products Are Non-Genotoxic” (2018), and “Peroxidase Mimicking DNAzymes Degrade Graphene Oxide” (2018), discovered that the enzyme myeloperoxidase (MPO) successfully degrades both graphene and graphene oxide.

Myeloperoxidase (MPO): An enzyme released by neutrophils, cells responsible for eliminating any foreign body or bacteria entering the body, present in the lungs. When a foreign body or bacteria is detected, neutrophils surround it and secrete MPO to destroy the threat.

Professor Andrea C. Ferrari, Head of Science and Technology at Graphene Flagship and Chairman of its Management Panel, stated: “The report on a successful pathway for graphene biodegradation is a very important step in ensuring the safe use of this material in applications. The Graphene Flagship has placed research into the health and environmental effects of graphene at the center of its program from the beginning. These results strengthen our confidence in the potential of graphene for biomedical and technological innovations.”

https://graphene-flagship.eu/materials/news/biodegradable-graphene/#:~:text=Ferrari%2C%20Science%20and%20Technology%20Officer,our%20innovation%20and%20technology%20roadmap%22

Cristina Martın, et al., Biocompatibility and biodegradability of 2D materials: graphene and beyond, Chem. Commun., 2019, 55, 5540

This discovery is crucial, as it confirms that graphene is not an accumulative material in the human body or the environment. Instead, it can be naturally processed and eliminated, reducing the risks of long-term toxicity.

Conclusion

Graphene and its derivatives have demonstrated a high degree of biocompatibility and controlled degradability in various scientific studies. While challenges remain, current evidence supports its safety in biomedical, industrial, and environmental applications.

The key to its proper use lies in selecting the right type of graphene and its functionalization, which helps minimize risks and enhance its benefits. Thanks to advances in research, the viability of graphene as an innovative, safe, and sustainable material is becoming increasingly clear, with applications ranging from regenerative medicine to advanced nanotechnology.

The continuous development of scientific studies will further strengthen its position as one of the key technologies of the future, ensuring its responsible and effective implementation across different industries.

Authored by: EF/DHS

Graphene, the differentiating material for the use of solar energy

Graphene

the differentiating material for the use of solar energy

Solar energy, being a clean and abundant source, is one of the best renewable energy options. However, despite technological advances, its utilization remains insignificant to date. According to statistics, only 0.015% of solar energy is used for electricity production, 0.3% for heating, and 11% for natural biomass photosynthesis. In contrast, about 85% of global energy needs are met through fossil fuels, which we know are finite and highly polluting resources.

“In 90 minutes, the sun sends enough energy to Earth to satisfy the entire planet’s energy demand for a year”

Solar cells are devices that convert solar energy into electricity through the photovoltaic effect. They are made of semiconductor materials that produce an electric field when exposed to sunlight and are divided into four generations:

First Generation

First-generation solar cells were first manufactured in 1954 by Bell Laboratories. They used crystalline films of monocrystalline and polycrystalline silicon with an average thickness of 200 to 300 µm, initially achieving an energy conversion efficiency of 6%, which later rose to 29% with the use of gallium arsenide (GaAs). In fact, these types of cells remain the most popular thanks to their high absorption coefficient.

Second Generation

It employs first-generation cells in conjunction with a new series of considerably thinner films of only 10 µm thickness based on microcrystalline silicon (µC-Si), amorphous silicon (A-Si), copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS), and cadmium telluride/cadmium sulfide (CDTE/CDS). Two advantages of this generation are its cost and mechanical resistance, while its disadvantage is that to achieve these benefits, conversion efficiency had to be sacrificed to some extent, reducing to 23%. Despite this drawback, these types of solar cells are still available in the market.

Third Generation

The high manufacturing cost of silicon cells, resulting from their complex manufacture from high-quality silicon, paved the way for the third generation, which integrates more flexible, lightweight, and economical materials. This is how dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSC), perovskite solar cells (PSC), organic/polymeric solar cells (OPV), quantum dot-sensitized solar cells (QDSSC), and finally, multi-junction solar cells emerged.

Probably the most interesting but also the most complex and expensive cell in this category is the multi-junction cell. As its name suggests, it consists of multiple junctions from various semiconductor materials that produce an electric current in response to different incident wavelengths, thus improving the conversion of sunlight into electricity; so far, the conversion efficiency recorded with these designs is 36%.

Fourth Generation (Hybrid)

This latest generation fuses the flexibility and low cost of polymers with the stability and durability of nanoparticles and metal oxides, as well as carbon nanostructures like graphene.

Graphene Solar Cells

Graphene is a carbon nanostructure with high conductivity, transmittance, mechanical strength, thermal stability, and chemical inertness. It also has a zero band gap structure that allows electron conduction as if it were a metal, as well as the quantum Hall effect that allows its free charges to move easily in two dimensions at high speed.

Thanks to these characteristics, it was discovered that graphene can be used for the manufacture of transparent conductive electrodes, energy harvesting devices, photodetectors, and other optical devices. However, although graphene is an excellent conductor, it does not have the same capacity to collect the electric current produced within a solar cell, unlike its oxidized variant, graphene oxide (GO), which is a less conductive material but more transparent and a better charge collector.

“Graphene has been classified as a semimetallic semiconductor that presents linear electronic dispersion with high mobility and high speeds.”

Another important factor of graphene is its thickness, which in turn depends on its number of layers. For this reason, graphene is classified as monolayer, bilayer, trilayer, few-layer (<5 layers), and multilayer (<10 layers), remembering that more than 10 layers of graphene is already considered graphite. As bilayer and trilayer graphene maintain a better balance between their transmittance and resistance properties, they are the most suitable for use in solar cells, on which ideally a maximum thickness of 20 nm should be maintained.

Applications of Graphene on Solar Cell Components

Transparent Conductive Electrodes (TCE)

The first components in which graphene has shown beneficial impacts are transparent conductive electrodes (TCE). Previously, due to its high conductivity and transmittance in the visible spectrum, indium tin oxide (ITO) was used for TCEs. However, the films tend to be fragile and unstable at high temperatures. Additionally, it’s worth mentioning that indium is an extremely scarce, toxic, and expensive metal. In fact, as the demand for solar cells increased, the price of indium rose to such an extent that the cost of TCEs represented 50% of manufacturing costs. For these reasons, ITO was replaced by fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO), which is more economical and withstands aggressive chemical treatments at high temperatures.

In addition to FTO, graphene appears as an alternative to overcome the limitations of ITO in solar cell TCEs, as long as the ratio between resistance and transmittance is increased. For this, chemical doping and co-doping of graphene with polymers such as PEN, PEDOT:PSS, gold nanoparticles, silver nanowires, cubic platinum nanoparticles, nitric acid (HNO₃), thionyl chloride (SOCl₂), triethylenetetramine (TETA), graphene oxide (GO), and bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (TFSA) have been studied with good results.

Doping: chemical modification to decrease graphene resistance and expand work function.


HNO₃-AuNp: nitric acid-gold nanoparticles.


PEN: poly(ethylene naphthalate): polyester polymer with barrier properties.


PEDOT:PSS: Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-poly(styrene sulfonate) / transparent and conductive polymer.

Photoactive Layers

The photoactive layers of solar cells include active interfacial layers, electron/hole charge separation layers, electron/hole transport layers (ETL/HTL), electron/hole blocking layers, and buffer layers.

According to reports, lithium-neutralized graphene oxide (GO-Li) in interfacial layers improves not only efficiency but also device stability in weathering (heat, air, and humidity) or as an anti-reflective protective film, thanks to its chemical inertness and transparency. Other functionalizations of graphene for photoactive layers include thiolate-reduced graphene oxide (TrGO) and graphene with cadmium sulfide (CdS).

Areas of Opportunity for Graphene on Different Types of Solar Cells

Silicon Solar Cells

Research indicates that the conversion efficiency of graphene solar cells can be improved by incorporating a dielectric passivation layer between the graphene and the silicon substrate to suppress electron diffusion from the latter to the graphene layer. Among the insulating materials that could be used effectively are silicon dioxide (SiO₂), molybdenum disulfide (MoS₂), aluminum oxide (Al₂O₃), graphene oxide (GO), hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN), poly(3-hexylthiophene-2,5-diyl) (P3HT), quantum dots, molybdenum trioxide (MoO₃), and spiroOMeTAD, to name a few.

Organic/Polymeric Solar Cells

In this type of cell, graphene can have three general functions:

                  1.              As an additive in donor or donor-acceptor materials,

                  2.              As a transparent conductive electrode (anode and cathode),

                  3.              As a separate photoactive layer.

Bilayer and trilayer graphene, thanks to their high conductivity, can correct the charge transport problems of the electron donor-acceptor system (P3HT:PCBM) associated with the imbalance of electron and hole mobility to avoid charge trapping and improve efficient collection.

P3HT:PCBM electron donor-acceptor system of polymeric solar cells.


P3HT: conductive polymer


PCBM: fullerene derivative.

Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells

This technology tries to emulate the process of plant cells to produce energy from organic pigments. In them, graphene was initially used to replace FTO in photoanodes, but over time additional advantages were identified in the following components:

  1. Photoanodes: as a transparent conductor for both titanium dioxide (TiO₂) and pigment sensitization; in photoanodes, graphene can improve the charge transport rate, prevent recombination, and increase light capture.

  2. Counter electrodes: as a substitute for platinum,

  3. As a photoanode additive: to improve electron transfer,

  4. Polymer electrodes, in which a polymer (PEDOT-PSS) allows conductivity, while graphene facilitates catalysis.

Photoanode: It is the vehicle for electrons from the photoexcited pigment to the external circuit. It consists of a layer of titanium dioxide (TiO₂) on a conductive glass or plastic substrate.

Counter electrodes: participate in the injection of electrons from the photooxidized pigment into the electrolytes to catalyze reduction reactions.

Perovskite Solar Cells

Perovskite is a mineral composed of calcium and titanium oxide that has been used for the manufacture of solar cells since 2009. Initially, its efficiency was 3.9% but quickly rose to 32%. Despite its good performance, ease of manufacture, and versatility, perovskite solar cells have two major disadvantages. The first is easy degradation in weathering, and the second is toxicity related to the presence of lead, which naturally raises concerns for human and environmental health. It is then that efforts to counteract these drawbacks have focused, on the one hand, on chemically modifying the mineral and, on the other, on encapsulating it to protect it from external conditions.

As with other types of cells, it has also been identified that the presence of graphene or its reduced variant within the photoactive layers (HTL/ETL) of perovskite cells can further improve their efficiency by 14 to 28%. This is because graphene, being an ambipolar material, that is, it can move charges in different directions, can help balance the work function – conductivity, speed up electron extraction, and improve stability in weathering.

Clearly, and as mentioned previously, the functionalization or doping of graphene plays an important role in improving the performance of solar cell components. In the case of perovskite cells, functionalization with metal nanoparticles, metal oxides, and/or perovskite nanoparticles is useful, not only to improve the stability of graphene but to increase the surface area and electrical conductivity throughout the system.

While it is a fact that graphene solar cells are not yet commercially available, some advances have already been reported in this direction. The first of these is the G12 Evolution series from Znshine Solar, composed of three graphene modules which, in 2018, won a contest to provide 37.5 MW of modules to Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (BHEL), India’s largest power generation equipment manufacturer. According to the contract, 10% of the shipment was graphene-coated solar panels. Subsequently, in 2019, the company signed a contract with Etihad Energy Services of the United Arab Emirates for the supply of 100MW.

Finally, at the end of 2024, the Australian companies Halocell Energy and First Graphene announced an alliance for a two-year project for the manufacture of perovskite solar cells with graphene. The objective was to accelerate the manufacturing process, improve light capture performance, and thus expand production and meet commercial demand. According to published information, graphene perovskite modules are up to five times more efficient and cost-effective than common silicon cells.

Bibliography

  1. Photovoltaic Cell Generations and Current Research Directions for Their Development Materials 2022, 15, 5542;
  2. Recent Advancements in Applications of Graphene to Attain Next-Level Solar Cells. C 2023, 9, 70;
  3. Rational and key strategies toward enhancing the performance of graphene/silicon solar cells. Mater. Adv., 2023, 4, 1876;
  4. Recent Applications of Graphene in Dye-sensitized Solar Cells. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science 20 (2015) 406;
  5. Recent advances of graphene-based materials in planar perovskite solar cells. Next Nanotechnology 5 (2024) 100061;
  6. https://www.halocell.energy/news-posts/first-graphene-to-supply-halocells-indoor-perovskite-solar-cell-production-line;
  7. https://www.graphene-info.com/graphene-solar-panels

Graphene Functionalization

Graphene Functionalization

Transforming Properties for Innovative Applications

Graphene is a carbon nanostructure in sheet form with multifunctional properties. Although it is usually chemically inert, under certain conditions and due to its extensive surface area, it can interact with other molecules or particles to generate a wide variety of derivatives with specific characteristics, as will be discussed below.

Chemically inert: incapable of reacting or inactive.

The interactions graphene can undergo are also known as functionalizations or dopings. These are chemical modifications aimed at giving graphene new properties or “functions.” For example, to make it hydrophilic, since it is well-known that graphene is inherently hydrophobic, making it challenging to manipulate. This quality leads to the most common functionalization, which involves anchoring oxygenated groups such as hydroxyl, epoxy, carbonyl, and carboxyl along its carbon structure, resulting in its most well-known variant: Graphene Oxide (GO).

“Graphene functionalization changes surface chemistry, such as charge and hydrophobicity.”

Covalent and Non-Covalent Functionalization

Graphene can be functionalized through covalent or non-covalent means. The former refers to the formation of strong chemical bonds with other particles or molecules that alter the structure and hybridization of its carbon atoms. This type of functionalization allows better control over the process compared to non-covalent functionalization (Van der Waals forces, electrostatic interactions, hydrogen bonding, or π-π stacking), which does not alter its chemical structure since the particles or molecules are adsorbed on its surface in a weaker and reversible manner.

“Graphene’s chemical functionalization is a vital tool for its integration into the world of applications.”

As mentioned earlier, the most well-known graphene functionalization is graphene oxide, also found in the literature as graphite oxide or oxidized graphene. This variant is defined as a single graphitic monolayer covalently functionalized with hydroxyl and epoxy groups above and below each graphene sheet, as well as carbonyl and carboxyl groups typically on its edges.

These modifications to the graphene structure have distinct advantages. For one, they improve its dispersion in aqueous media, prevent re-agglomeration, provide more interaction sites for additional functionalizations, facilitate incorporation into three-dimensional materials (e.g., polymers), and ultimately allow for greater production scalability of both GO and graphene itself. This is because the oxygenated groups anchored to the GO surface can be removed through chemical, electrochemical, or thermal methods that partially restore the graphene structure, making GO a precursor material.

This is significant because one reason there are few graphene applications in the market is that common production methods yield low or insufficient amounts for industrial use. Below are some examples of unrelated functionalizations of graphene and its derivatives for various applications.

Graphene Functionalization with Polymers

For proper graphene functionalization, it is essential to form strong bonds between graphene’s carbon atoms and polymers through covalent functionalizations. However, this is a complex task since graphene consists only of carbon and lacks functional groups for conjugation. For this reason, GO and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) are the primary precursors for graphene functionalization with polymers via non-covalent bonds.

One example is the direct functionalization of GO through π-π stacking during polymer extrusion processes, where high temperatures and strong shear forces fracture aggregates and allow polymer chains to diffuse into the GO sheets’ spaces, facilitating proper integration. In this way, GO can transfer its properties—primarily mechanical—to the polymer.

However, GO can also be functionalized with other structures, such as chitosan, to integrate into polymers like polyvinyl propylene (PVP) and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) or directly functionalized with polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) or polyethylene glycol (PEG) for bioapplications.

Another example of GO functionalization is with polyaniline, a conductive polymer, to create electrode materials with improved electrochemical performance and greater long-term stability. Similarly, functionalization with polypyrrole-based compounds enhances energy storage capacities. GO can also be functionalized with metallic nanoparticles like copper or silver to increase electrical conductivity in conductive coatings or inks.

Graphene Functionalization for Biomedical Applications

Dispersion stability of graphene is an essential requirement for success in all applications. For this reason, GO is the most commonly used variant. Additional functionalizations can be made through the oxygenated groups present across its surface, which not only improve graphene’s dispersion in water but also increase its biocompatibility and safety. Furthermore, its extensive surface area, including graphene’s intrinsic hydrophobic regions, allows the adsorption of organic molecules, DNA, RNA, proteins, ions, or polymers via non-covalent interactions (π-π stacking, hydrogen bonding, and electrostatic interactions) for various medical applications. Examples include designing biocatalytic platforms through functionalization with gold nanoparticles for use in diagnostic biosensors, with fluorescent pigments for imaging, with silver nanoparticles for antimicrobial purposes, or with polymers like polyethylene glycol for drug anchoring and delivery.

Graphene Functionalization for Photovoltaic Device Fabrication

Graphene’s properties that have positioned it as a strong candidate for optimizing photovoltaic devices include its lightness, transparency, large surface area, and lack of a bandgap due to its high mobility and electrical conductivity at room temperature.

Bandgap: energy barrier that electrons must overcome to flow as electrical current.

Over the years, graphene’s performance has been studied in interfacial layers, active layers, and as transparent conductive electrodes. Incorporating graphene into silicon solar cells can increase energy conversion efficiency by 20%; in perovskite graphene solar cells, higher current density and efficiency exceeding 80% have been observed. For dye-sensitized solar cells utilizing graphene oxide functionalized with titanium dioxide (TiO2), a plasmonic effect has been observed, demonstrating better light capture and charge transport efficiency.

Other examples of functionalizations tested on graphene include poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT), gold nanoparticles, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): poly(styrenesulfonic acid), bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)amide, and metals like copper.

Graphene Functionalization for Lubricant Fabrication

In traditional synthetic oils, certain additives with nanoparticles are used to reduce energy loss and wear. This is justified by their ability to create protective films between the contact interfaces of rough surfaces, reducing friction and wear. However, a limitation for their use in lubricating oils, especially those with low viscosity, is the nanoparticles’ limited stability.

Graphene’s tribological or lubricating efficiency originates from its high mechanical strength, flat and thin structure with weak interlayer bonds, high thermal stability, and extensive surface area. Nevertheless, as in many other applications, graphene doping with nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfur, boron, and fluorine, or with alkyl groups like octadecylamine, octadecyltrichlorosilane, and octadecyltriethoxysilane, or modifications with amines such as alkylamines further improve its tribological properties. Additionally, polymer functionalization has shown good results not only for tribology but also for dispersion and stability, e.g., with polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), poly(ether-ether-ketone), and polyethyleneimine. Other studies have also reported functionalizations of graphene with octadecylamine for purposes such as lubricant biodegradability, among others.

The above describes only a few examples of the countless functionalizations that can be applied to graphene for specific applications. In many cases, the presence of graphene within a material or mixture is insufficient to generate a notable effect. Fortunately, its field of action is so broad that, when properly synthesized and utilized, it is possible to achieve astonishing results.

Written by: EF/DHS

  1. Surface Functionalization of Graphene-Based Materials: Biological Behavior, Toxicology, and Safe-By-Design Aspects , Adv. Biology 2021, 5, 2100637
  2. Applications of Pristine and Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes, Graphene, and Graphene Nanoribbons in Biomedicine. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 3020
  3. Modelling of graphene functionalization, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2016, 18, 6351
  4. Graphene and functionalized graphene: Extraordinary prospects for nanobiocomposite materials . Composites Part B: Engineering, 2017, 121,34  
  5. Highly Stable Graphene Oxide-Gold Nanoparticle Platforms for Biosensing Applications, 2017,  Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 20(3)
  6. Graphene oxide: a stable carbon framework for functionalization, : J. Mater. Chem. A, 2013, 1, 11559
  7. Functionalised graphene as flexible electrodes for polymer photovoltaics, Journal of Alloys and Compounds Volume 825, 5 June 2020, 153954
  8. Graphene and its derivatives for solar cells application, Nano Energy Volume 47, May 2018, Pages 51-65
  9. Effect of HNO3 functionalization on large scale graphene for enhanced tri-iodide reduction in dye-sensitized solar cells, journal of materials chemistry, 2012, 38
  10. The development of TiO2-graphene oxide nano composite thin films for solar cells, Results in Physics 11 (2018) 46
  11. Graphene/Si Schottky solar cells: a review of recent advances and prospects, RSC Adv., 2019, 9, 863–877 |
  12. Tribological improvement of potential lubricants for electric vehicles using double functionalized graphene oxide as additives, Tribology International 193 (2024) 109402
  13. Graphene-Based Nanomaterials as Lubricant Additives: A Review, Lubricants 2022, 10, 273

Graphene Aerogels

Graphene Aerogels

A Revolution in Decontamination and Industrial Efficiency

Aerogels are synthetic, translucent materials with a gel-like appearance in which the liquid content is replaced with air or gas, creating a porous network of interconnected nanostructures. They are typically made from silica, alumina, chromium oxide, titanium, tin, or carbon, each offering specialized properties for different industries. For instance, in construction, they provide thermal and acoustic insulation; in food, they control moisture; in medicine, they release drugs and repair bone defects; in agriculture, they optimize water usage; and in environmental purification, they adsorb contaminants in water and air.

“Despite their advantages, aerogels face challenges such as fragility and high costs, prompting ongoing research to improve them.”

Graphene, a planar nanostructure consisting of one to ten layers of tightly bonded carbon atoms, boasts extraordinary mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties transferable to other materials. However, to ensure this transfer, graphene often undergoes additional functionalization with oxygen groups or chemical/physical dopants like DNA molecules, metallic ions, nanoparticles, or polymers. These modifications inhibit the π-π stacking of graphene layers, improving their interaction and stability—key challenges given graphene’s tendency to aggregate.

“A critical factor for graphene’s performance is the proper dispersion and distribution of its layers throughout the host material matrix.”

The intersection of aerogels and graphene lies in the fact that aerogels provide a three-dimensional macroscopic structure where graphene can remain stable without aggregating. Additionally, graphene enhances aerogel properties, such as lightweight construction, electrical conductivity, thermal insulation, compressibility, and elasticity. It also allows functionalization with other materials like cobalt hydroxide, cobalt oxide, manganese dioxide, molybdenum oxide, molybdenum disulfide, nitrogen, sulfur, or boron to improve electrochemical detection performance, supercapacitor efficiency, electrocatalytic functions, or contaminant adsorption.

Graphene Aerogels for Decontamination:

Graphene’s adsorbent capabilities are well-documented, particularly in its oxidized form, graphene oxide (GO), which offers a large surface area and numerous interaction sites for capturing pollutants. However, challenges such as the difficulty of removing adsorbed substances and recycling GO sheets limit practical applications. Recent advancements suggest that three-dimensional graphene aerogels effectively prevent GO aggregation during adsorption and enhance regeneration capabilities. These new structures, with their extremely low density, high porosity, and large surface area, facilitate contaminant diffusion and adsorption within the 3D network while enabling recyclability.

A 2024 study published in the renowned journal Nature detailed two methods for producing graphene aerogels. This research evaluated the photocatalytic capacity of both materials, finding superior performance compared to non-graphene counterparts. The study also analyzed various toxic organic solvents, pigments, and oils, such as formaldehyde, dichloromethane, acetone, ethanol, methanol, pump oil, castor oil, and silicone oil, achieving higher decontamination rates. Additionally, graphene aerogels have been shown to remove up to 99% of heavy metals from water, outperforming conventional adsorbents like activated carbon and other treatment methods like ion exchange, coagulation, and filtration. These advantages stem from their larger surface area, higher adsorption capacity, longer lifespan, and regenerative properties.

In air decontamination, most systems use high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters with activated carbon. However, their limited adsorption capacity necessitates frequent maintenance and filter replacements. Addressing this issue, a study by Tianjin University in China explored the photocatalytic capability of titanium dioxide combined with the adsorption capacity of graphene aerogels. The research concluded that the synergy between these materials offers significant advantages over conventional filtration systems.

This demonstrates how two distinct technologies can merge to create synergies and address various challenges. For Energeia-Graphenemex, a leading Latin American company in graphene material production and application development, it is inspiring to see how graphene technology is gradually making a positive impact across different industrial sectors.

Authored by: EF/DHS

References:

  1. Gaelle Nassar, et. al., A review on the current research on graphene-based aerogels and their applications. Carbon Trends 4 (2021) 100065;
  2. Ting Yao et. al., Preparation of β-cyclodextrin-reduced graphene oxide aerogel and its application for adsorption of herbicides. Journal of Cleaner Production, 468, (2024) 143109;
  3. Karabo G. Sekwele et. al., Cellulose, graphene and graphene‑cellulose composite aerogels and their application in water treatment: a review. Discover Materials (2024) 4:23;
  4. Ashish K. Kasar et al., Graphene aerogel and its composites: synthesis, properties and applications. Journal of Porous Materials (2022) 29:1011

Graphene

Graphene

The Most Versatile Carbon Allotrope with Extraordinary Properties 

Carbon is one of Earth’s most abundant elements and vital for living organisms. Known as the “king” of the periodic table, its chemical properties are exceptional due to an electronic structure capable of forming single, double, and triple bonds, allowing it to create up to ten million compounds. 

Carbon allotropes are carbon-based materials with different molecular configurations and, consequently, unique properties. For instance, in graphite, a soft, thermally resistant, and electrically conductive material, carbon atoms form three covalent bonds in a hexagonal pattern, arranged in stacked layers loosely bonded together. 

Graphite’s common uses include pencils, batteries, and lubricants. Meanwhile, in diamond, an insulating material highly valued in jewelry, carbon atoms are bonded covalently in a tetrahedral structure, giving it extreme hardness used mainly for cutting tools. 

Other lesser-known carbon allotropes are nanometric in size (smaller than 0.1 microns). These include fullerenes, which resemble a soccer ball and can act as semiconductors or superconductors; single- or multi-walled nanotubes, tubular carbon layers known for their strength, elasticity, and conductivity. 


Finally, Graphene is a molecule composed of carbon layers similar to graphite, but in isolated blocks of one to ten layers, offering superior properties in mechanical strength, thermal and electrical conductivity, among others. 

“Other materials should not be classified as carbon allotropes, e.g., activated carbon and carbon black, defined as carbonaceous materials obtained from carbon-containing raw materials.” 

Activated Carbon, or charcoal, resembles graphite but has a rough and porous structure with a significant adsorptive capacity, mainly used to remove pollutants in air or water. Unlike graphite or graphene, which have carbon atoms organized in a hexagonal pattern, activated carbon consists of heptagonal and pentagonal rings with disorganized impurities, often produced by carbonizing biomass like wood, coconut shells, bones, or petroleum coke in the absence of air, followed by partial gasification with steam or carbon dioxide to alter its porosity. 

“In activated carbon, ‘activation’ refers to the use of physical or chemical means to increase its porosity and surface area.” 

Carbon Black, or soot, is an amorphous carbon colloid made of aggregated nanometric spheres with about 1% organic species. It is obtained from the incomplete combustion of hydrocarbons like petroleum under controlled conditions. Although it shares a carbonaceous nature with activated carbon, its properties depend on particle distance rather than porosity. While activated carbon is valued for its adsorptive properties, carbon black is used as a rubber reinforcement, in conductive pigments, or as a UV stabilizer. 

What Makes Graphene a Superior Material? Among carbon allotropes and carbonaceous materials, graphene is the most revolutionary nanomaterial and is considered the fundamental unit of all graphite forms, as it can be curved into fullerenes, rolled into nanotubes, or stacked into graphite. Graphene’s superior properties stem from the strong, organized bonds between its atoms, creating a honeycomb structure that explains its mechanical strength, while a free electron from each carbon atom allows its excellent conductivity. 

Graphene’s extraordinary multifunctionality extends beyond its mechanical and conductive properties; it is also extremely lightweight, transparent, impermeable, biocompatible, antimicrobial, anticorrosive, radiation-resistant, and can chemically interact with other substances to share its properties. This adaptability promotes its use in various industries, from construction to enhance concrete properties; recycling and plastics to extend material lifespan; anticorrosive and antimicrobial coatings to increase protective efficiency, to electronics, energy, and biomedical fields, offering benefits tailored to each sector’s needs.

 How Is Graphene Produced? There are two main techniques to obtain graphene. The first, known as “bottom-up,” involves Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD), which extracts carbon atoms from gases like methane. Although well-known, this method is rarely used for industrial production due to low scale and high costs. The second and more common method is “top-down,” involving mechanical, electrochemical, or chemical exfoliation of bulk graphite to isolate carbon or graphene layers. Fewer than 10 layers is considered graphene, while more layers are classified as graphite. Graphene, unlike 3D graphite, has a two-dimensional structure (2D), where thickness is on a nanometric scale. One defining feature is that graphene is just one atom thick. 

Energeia-Graphenemex®, a pioneering Mexican company in Latin America focused on graphene material research and production, excels in creating patented methods and processes for scalable graphene production. This ensures availability for developing applications, whether in-house or as a strategic partner with companies interested in innovating and enhancing products with this extraordinary technology. 

Written by EF/DHS 

Carbonation and Graphene Oxide:

Carbonation and Graphene Oxide:

A Solution for Reducing CO₂ Emissions

In previous articles, we discussed the cement industry’s impact on CO₂ emissions and the commitments made to reduce them by 2050. Today, we explore how carbonation—a process generally seen as a concrete pathology—could help offset some CO₂ emissions from cement production.

What is Carbonation?

In concrete, carbonation is a natural process where CO₂ from the environment reacts with moisture in the concrete, converting the alkaline calcium hydroxide in cement paste to calcium carbonate with a more neutral pH. This reaction lowers the concrete’s pH from around 12–13 to approximately 9, exposing steel reinforcements to corrosion.

What Affects Carbonation?

Carbonation rate depends on the diffusion of CO₂ and its reactivity with the cement matrix, which is in turn influenced by the matrix’s microstructure, hydration products (calcium hydroxide, calcium silicate hydrate, alkaline oxides, etc.), and pore structure (distribution, size, and saturation). Therefore, carbonation proceeds more slowly in low-permeability or dry concretes than in permeable ones with 50–60% humidity. To reduce porosity and calcium hydroxide levels, micrometric additives like fly ash, blast furnace slag, metakaolin, silica fume, and some nanomaterials are used during concrete production, alongside practices like applying surface coatings.

Carbonation as an Emission Reduction Tool

Carbonation can be viewed in two ways: first, as a concrete pathology, and second, as a CO₂-reducing opportunity. There are two types of carbonation: natural and accelerated. Natural carbonation is slow and does not capture CO₂, while accelerated (or mineral) carbonation uses high CO₂ concentrations, speeding up cement hydration and producing carbonates in which CO₂ is permanently stored in a thermodynamically stable mineral form. This process, known as recarbonation, involves the same carbonate used as a raw material in cement production. Companies like Blue Planet, Carbon Cure, Solidia Technologies, and Carbi Crete are developing strategies to sequester up to 17 kg of CO₂ per cubic meter of prefabricated concrete, as this process requires controlled conditions.

Graphene Oxide (GO) and Its Impact

Graphene oxide (GO) is a carbon nanostructure whose multifunctionality offers numerous benefits across industries. In concrete, GO enhances mechanical strength and durability, though its effects on carbonation and CO₂ capture are less well-documented.

Research conducted by the University of Arlington, Texas, in 2022 examined GO’s interaction mechanism in concrete cured under accelerated carbonation. Results indicated that GO, by improving cement hydration, refines concrete pores with calcium carbonate precipitated on hydration products and cement particles, limiting chemical reactions between hydration products and CO₂ under continuous CO₂ flow. The study concluded that GO not only enhances concrete’s mechanical properties but also helps capture and store up to 30% of atmospheric CO₂ during early curing stages.

Authored by: EF/ DHS

References

  1. Geetika Mishra, et al., Carbon sequestration in graphene oxide modified cementitious system, Journal of Building Engineering, 2022, 62, 105356;
  2. Nur Azni Farhana Mazri et al., Graphene and its tailoring as emerging 2D nanomaterials in efficient CO2 absorption: A state-of-the-art interpretative review. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 2023, 77, 479;
  3. Mohd Hanifa et al., A review on CO2 capture and sequestration in the construction industry: Emerging approaches and commercialised technologies, Journal of CO2 Utilization, 2023, 67, 102292;
  4. Yating Ye et al., Optimizing the Properties of Hybrids Based on Graphene Oxide forCarbon Dioxide Capture, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2022, 61, 1332;
  5. Sanglakpam Chiranjiakumari Devi et al., Influence of graphene oxide on sulfate attack and carbonation of concrete containing recycled concrete aggregate, Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 250, 118883

Advances in Fire Protection:

Advances in Fire Protection:

The Promise of Graphene Oxide in Intumescent Coatings

Intumescent coatings are specialized paints applied to concrete and steel structures in industrial and residential buildings to offer fire protection. They provide safety by allowing enough time for evacuation and assistance in the event of a fire.

During a fire, these coatings expand and form a carbonized foam that isolates the fire and limits its spread, while simultaneously releasing non-combustible gases that reduce the oxygen concentration around the structures, protecting them from significant damage for approximately 1 to 3 hours.

The main components of intumescent coatings are a polymeric binder, an acid source (e.g., ammonium polyphosphate – APP), an expansion additive (e.g., melamine – MEL), a carbon source (e.g., pentaerythritol – PER), and other filler elements (e.g., expandable graphite), which often influence the expansion factor and fire retardancy.

Despite their efficiency, the carbonized foam formed by the APP-MEL-PER system may have poor oxidation resistance at high temperatures, leading to lower fire-retardant efficiency and easier destruction during combustion. Therefore, other additives such as calcium carbonate, aluminum hydroxide, silica, and certain carbon materials have been explored to enhance their protection. For example, expandable graphite in epoxy coatings improves thermal degradation and fire resistance; carbon nanotubes reduce the heat release rate in polymers, and graphene oxide (GO), thanks to its reticular nanostructure, has been identified as an effective thermal barrier to prevent flame diffusion and reduce heat propagation. This occurs because GO, when evenly dispersed within the coating matrix, forms a “tortuous path” that reduces the thermal diffusion rate and matrix decomposition, thus improving fire resistance and mechanical strength.

Although no intumescent coatings with graphene oxide are currently on the market, research has shown that GO can improve the APP-MEL-PER system by promoting the decomposition reaction of APP, which accelerates the formation of phosphoric acid that reacts with PER to form carbon. While it has been observed that GO may slightly decrease the thermal stability of coatings, its presence encourages gas production and intumescent coefficients, reducing thermal conductivity.

Energeia-Graphenemex®, in collaboration with a renowned Mexican specialized coatings company, is working on a new development to launch the first intumescent coating with graphene oxide to continue placing Mexico at the forefront of new technologies.

Authored by: EF/DHS

References:

  1. Wang Zhan et al., Influence of graphene on fire protection of intumescent fire retardant

coating for steel structure, Energy Reports 6 (2020) 693;

  • Qiuchen Zhang et al., Effects and Mechanisms of Ultralow Concentrations of Different Types of Graphene Oxide Flakes on Fire Resistance of Water-Based Intumescent Coatings, Coatings 2024, 14, 162;
  • M. Sabet, et al., The Effect of Graphene Oxide on Flame Retardancy of Polypropylene and Polystyrene, Materials Performance and Characterization 9, no. 1 (2020): 284;
  • Cheng‑Fei Cao et al., Fire Intumescent, High‑Temperature Resistant, Mechanically Flexible Graphene Oxide Network for Exceptional Fire Shielding and Ultra‑Fast Fire Warning, Nano-Micro Lett. (2022) 14:92;
  • Quanyi Liu et al., Recent advances in the flame retardancy role of graphene and its derivatives in epoxy resin materials. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2021, 149, 106539

The Impact of Graphene on the Plastic Industry:

The Impact of Graphene on the Plastic Industry:

Innovation and Sustainability

The origins of plastic trace back to 1860 in the United States when Phelan & Collander, amid an ivory shortage—a material widely used for billiard balls, piano keys, jewelry, and decorative structures—announced a call for a material capable of replacing ivory, offering substantial financial compensation for the time. John Wesley Hyatt proposed “celluloid,” a plant-based carbohydrate that, while not fully replacing ivory, became the stepping stone for the development of plastic, with immediate successors like Bakelite and PVC leading to today’s engineering plastics.

The term “plastic” comes from the Greek “plastikos,” meaning “moldable.”

Plastics are synthetic materials obtained through various polymerization processes from petroleum derivatives. Their evolution and refinement have made them essential to numerous industries and activities. However, after years of unchecked use, plastics have become both a solution for many needs and a significant environmental and health issue, as their versatility and demand have also led to increased waste. As a result, the not-so-new philosophy of sustainable circularity, or the circular economy, involves not only awareness of resource use but also economic, infrastructure, and recycling process adaptations.

Recycling involves reprocessing used materials, such as plastics, for reuse. While an excellent tool for preserving natural resources and reducing waste, two key points must be considered. First, recycling doesn’t apply in all cases because not all plastics are recyclable. Second, reprocessing involves stages where materials may lose properties compared to virgin plastics, limiting their use in many industrial applications.

Over the past 20 years, nanotechnology’s intervention in modifying polymers like polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), and polyethylene terephthalate (PET), among others, with carbon nanoparticles like graphene or carbon nanotubes (CNTs), has yielded interesting results regarding improved mechanical, rheological, electrical, and thermal properties. Graphene’s advantage over CNTs, in addition to other intrinsic properties, lies in its sheet-like structure, whose large surface area and greater dispersibility allow it to create more homogeneous phases, improving load transfer and thereby increasing the mechanical strength of modified plastics.

Companies such as Gerdau Graphene (Brazil), Graphenetech S.L. (Spain), Colloids (UK), and Energeia-Graphenemex (Mexico) have positioned various types of graphene-based masterbatches or concentrated plastics in the market over the past five years. Although each company has its own objectives and markets, there are environmental and economic points of convergence that motivated them to improve the plastic industry. Graphene, even in low concentrations (< 2% by weight), can enhance the quality of both virgin and recycled polymers. For example, graphene can increase flexural modulus by 30%, impact resistance by 40%, tensile strength by 17%, and resistance to rupture by 60%. It can also improve resistance to photodegradation. Depending on the specific needs of each development or application, it is possible to restore some of the mechanical properties of recycled plastics and/or extend the material’s lifespan to reduce the circulation of single-use plastics or, alternatively, achieve the same mechanical properties of polymers with reduced thickness.

Energeia – Graphenemex®, the leading Mexican company in Latin America in graphene material research and production for industrial applications, launched a wide range of graphene-based masterbatches in 2023 through its Graphenergy Masterbatch line, designed to be used as multifunctional reinforcement additives. Key advantages include:

  • Excellent dispersion within the polymer matrix
  • Can be incorporated into recycled polymers
  • Increase tensile, deformation, and impact resistance
  • Improve resistance to ultraviolet rays
  • Facilitate processing conditions (thermal stability)
  • Act as nucleating agents (modify polymer crystallization temperature).

Drafting: EF/DHS

References:

  1. Ramazan Asmatulu et al., Synthesis and Analysis of Injection-Molded Nanocomposites of Recycled High-Density Polyethylene Incorporated With Graphene Nanoflakes, POLYMER COMPOSITES—2015;
  2. Feras Korkees et al., Functionalised graphene effect on the mechanical and thermal properties of recycled PA6/PA6,6 blends. 2021 Journal of Composite Materials 55(16);
  3. Devinda Wijerathne et. al., Mechanical and graphe properties of graphene nanoplatelets-reinforced recycled polycarbonate composites. International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture 6 (2023) 117e128;
  4. Abdou Khadri Diallo et al., A multifunctional additive for sustainability, Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 33, 2022, e000487.